Thursday, 6 June 2013

Evaluation


We presented the finished film to a focus group so we could gain feedback as a group. The focus group contained of a group of around 10 people, i felt like this was a suitable amount of people so we could gain a good amount of feedback, and we could get a collective feedback.

The positive feedback that our film gained was re-occurring throughout the focus group was that we had good and smooth camera work, the characters and acting had a lot of positive feedback, especially the main character and how he had the look and feel, which represented what the audience wanted. Another repetitive comment that i found out was that the use of certain tracks and sound immerses you into the start of the film as well as creating feelings whilst watching it.

With any focus group you are looking for feedback, positive and negative, and like any other focus group ours was no different, there are aspects that they felt that could've been improved or changed. a point that kept appearing is that the audience did not think that the storyline was very clear, they didn't understand what was going on, and they saw that as negative feedback, but i saw this more a positive as we only did show the beginning of the film and if they understood straight away the rest of the film would render pointless, it created mystery and suspense which are some conventions of a thriller. However we did get a few comments in which that the zoom and dolly shot where kind of shaky which took you away from the film and seemed out of place.

My group contanited of three people, myself, Luke and Liam. As a group i feel like we worked very well post production and production wise. As any group we had a lot of discussions as everyone had their own opinion on how the intro should look, the way we resolved this was breaking down everyones idea and explaining what would work and what wouldn't, and because of this we combined the ideas and came up with a solution. I personally feel the group i was working with brought the best out in me, and even though our product could use improvements i don’t feel like i could've done any better with anyone else. During the Production of the film, i had the job of trying to visualize how the film would fit together and trying to get every shot that we would need for it to work, but with every task that we did, everyone had input which was extremely helpful. As a group we were always on top on what we had to do, we were quick and effective, we made sure that we had everything done with quality but quick. Overall i would work in the group again, and i reckon that the next product would turn out a lot better than our first.

In the way the opening scene turned out i am overall happy, the feel of the film suited in what we wanted, it creates that feel of suspense and mystery, and also how we edited the film helped convey moods. We did run into problems all throughout the production in that the eyepiece of the camera was not working so we had to rely on the LCD screen of the camera which in bright sunlight was not the best as we could not see the detail in the scenes. Even though we did have problems, and we used natural lighting and no professional lighting the overall look of the films works well.

Influence wise we looked a specific group of films, which were all low budget films that have been filmed in the UK, the reason for this is because this is what we wanted, we didn't want it to feel something that the film was never going to be. A main selection of films in what we looked at was Once Upon A Time in the Midlands and Dead Mans Shoes, but we did look at the style of Quentin Tarantino. You can see aspects of the films and style throughout the film. We wanted it also to look like a horror opening that and fast paced action opening.

Final Production

Monday, 13 May 2013

Production Planning - Meeting Minutes


Meeting Minutes



Wednesday 19th December 2012

Members Present
  • Luke Price
  • Chris Roden
  • Liam Gregory

With all members of the group present, we discussed our initial ideas for our thriller opening. The thriller sub genre, pace, characters, narrative and style were all considered and various ideas were produced (evidenced on mind map and expansion of ideas). All of our ideas involved some kind of suspense and enigma as they are a staple for thrillers. Our ideas involving characters did not give away many details about the characters in relation to their name, part of the story etc until the very end of the scene. We also kept in mind ease of shooting, acquiring locations, obtaining props and time needed to both prepare and shoot the sequence. However this will be discussed in more depth once a treatment and job allocation was decided on in further meetings.

After much discussion, we decided to expand on the idea labelled as idea 2 on the expansion of ideas list. We then decided that by the next meeting we would have a completed first draft of a treatment and have thought about production roles for each member of the group. The production roles would then be finalised in the meeting, along with any alterations to the treatment.





Friday 21st December 2012

Members Present
  • Luke Price
  • Chris Roden
  • Liam Gregory

Now that an idea was finalised, we brought the first draft of our treatment to the meeting to implement any changes that we felt were needed. The choice to take out the small pieces of dialogue that were in the scene were to build more mystery around the characters involved and create an eerier piece of film. This was the only significant change, with the others being subtle shot/angle changes as we thought the updated version would look more professional and deliver a better product overall.

Job roles were discussed and allocated to each member based on their strengths and interests in the filmmaking process. As some parts of production needed input from all three of us, some jobs were allocated to one person to specifically concentrate on, while also allowing input from the other members of the group. A perfect example of this is the role of the editor which was given to Liam. Although he will carry out all the physical editing and make many of the decisions, Luke and Chris will also be able to make suggestions and come to group agreements about certain editing choices made in the final product.

Now that a full narrative has been decided on, with many of the technical aspects finalised, locations need to be found, props must start to be acquired, risk assessments carried out and a shooting schedule drawn up. The next meeting will be compiling the completed versions of these.





Thursday 3rd January 2013

Members Present
  • Luke Price
  • Chris Roden
  • Liam Gregory

Upon meeting, we brought together a finished storyboard, risk assessment and shooting schedule. The call sheet was is not yet done, but with enough time before shooting commences, in the next meeting. Locations have been found and permission to shoot in these has been acquired, ensuring an easy shoot with no interruptions or setbacks. With completed risk assessments, the danger of shooting on location have been considered and safeguards are being prepared, with all locations deemed safe enough to shoot on/in.

For our next meeting, we are going to bring a finished call sheet, and ensure we are still ready to shoot, solving any problems that may arise from now until then that could hinder our shooting plans.






Monday 21st January 2013

Members Present
  • Luke Price
  • Chris Roden
  • Liam Gregory

The call sheet has now been completed and fits in with the shooting schedule. No problems have arisen since the last meeting meaning shooting may go ahead as normal. Chris has collected all props needed and the appropriate makeup and costumes have been acquired by Luke. All documents were reviewed once more to ensure nothing had been missed out, which they hadn’t.

Production Planning - Call Sheet


Production Planning - Shooting Schedule


Production Planning - Risk Assessment




Production Planning- Storyboard



Production Planning - Recce Shots




















Production Planning - Job Roles


Directors Of Photography - Luke Price, Liam Gregory, Chris Roden
Camera Operator - Luke Price
Sound Recordist - Liam Gregory
Editor - Liam Gregory (under supervision of Luke Price and Chris Roden)
Lighting - Liam Gregory
Graphic Design - Chris Roden
Script - Chris Roden
Costumes - Luke Price
Make-up - Luke Price
Props - Chris Roden
Location Manager - Chris Roden

Production Planning - Treatment


Production Planning - Initial Ideas